Skip to main content

Love Is An Enabling Emotion

 What is love? I think for a while; but nothing very concrete comes to my mind except a few popular cultural images like the heart, red roes, or red colour. Love is so very abstract. I extent my search into what we hear people say about what love does? For each one love bears a different action. Some die because of love; some live because of love. Some work a little more hard and make a little more money because of love; some stop working and make less money because of love. Some hold on because of love; others let go because of love.

love, eros, philia, agape

Love is an enabling emotion that enables me beyond me to us, from us to them. To understand this movement we must also understand gradation of love. There are three grades in the quality of love as proposed by three Greek terminologies: eros, philia, and agape.

Eros: This is the feeling of love that is ‘me-oriented’. It is what makes one say, “I love pizza”, “I love that song”, “I love that person, only that person”, etc. Eros is directed towards things or people or situations that make one feel good. The reason for this love is that some characteristic in the other person or thing is pleasing us. If the characteristic would cease to exist, the reason for the love would be gone. That person or thing is no more beneficial to me; thus love too will dry up.

Philia: This is brotherly/sisterly love. It is friendship. It is the basis of ethnic, linguistic, religious groupism. It is the kind of love that is based on shared interests, common goals, or personalities that just seem to get along well. It describes affection, fondness, or liking another person. It responds to appreciation, respect, and kindness. It involves giving as well as receiving; but when it is greatly strained, it can collapse in a crisis. Philia is we-oriented.

Agape: This is the noblest word for love in the Greek language, and it is the word that scripture uses for God’s love for us. “God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). Here love goes out to even those who are unlovable or have no merit to be loved. Thomas Aquinas described it as “to will the good of another.” It is the kind of love that acts and sacrifices on behalf of others, even at great cost. It is other oriented.

Eros is good if exercised within the boundaries: by all means enjoy music and pizza and a beer. Philia is good in many circumstances: by all means enjoy friendship and fellowship and companionship. By all means enjoy the shared purpose and goals of a true team. But no kind of love supersedes agape.

Again, eros is me-oriented, philia is we-oriented, and agape is others-oriented. True love is self-creative. It may begin from loving me, but it quickly enables on to move to us, and ultimately to others.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Awesomeness Vs. Negativity

 Some people are awesome. You know them by their presence. They bring happiness wherever they go. They stand with those who do good. They promote and recognise others’ thoughts and contribution. They appreciate people. They attempt to find answers and solutions to questions and problems. Others doing better and bigger things do not threaten or make them insecure. The opposite of awesomeness in social conduct is negativity. Stay away from people who have a question for every answer; and has a problem with every solution you find. Jesus went around doing good in every possible manner: he healed the sick, he fed the hungry. The Pharisees definitely felt threatened and insecure. They try to act out their authority (Mark 8:11-13); and asked Jesus for a heavenly sign. Jesus’ mind and ministry did not get stuck in the negativities around him. He did not get sucked into the drama the Pharisees were staging. He sighed and got on to the other shore. There he continued to do good. Jesus gives t

We Come Across A Challenge Only Once

 The apostles of Jesus were listening and conversing with him at the farewell discourse of Jesus (John 14-17). He told them a lot of things which made sense to them, they were happy to hear those gracious words, like, a lesson on love –love one another as I have loved you – some of them, even asked further questions and learn more theories of it; I will not leave you orphans, I will go and send you another helper; I will go, I will take you also to the place where I am going, etc. And as he was talking, he also also told them, “After a little while you will not see me…” (John 16: 16-20). Now they wake up, and ask one another, what is he saying? What does he mean by ‘a little while’? Is everything going to change? We fancy every word of the gospel and scriptures. We fancy faith, we fancy religion, we fancy love, mercy, reconciliation, inclusivity, etc. But not now –we don't want to do it now. All want to die and go to heaven, for we fancy heaven so much –but not now.  We constantly

Inter-religious Sensitivity in the Time of Covid-19

  I was religiously pleased and humanly excited to read the story of a Hindu doctor reciting Kalima Shahada for a dying Muslim Covid patient in Kerala. Beevathu, 56 year old, was all isolated from her family in a covid ward. She had been there for 17 days, she was on a ventilator, and it was increasingly clear that there was no hope. After the consent from her family she was taken off from the ventilator. Beevathu lies there between life and death. Nothing more to happen. But like any good dying Muslim, she perhaps wanted to hear the Kalima Shahada (the Islamic oath of faith) to be chanted to her by one of her family members; but there was none, the situation made it so. Dr. Rekha, a Hindu doctor, was attending to her all these days. She knew what was happening, and she also knew what was not happening. Dr. Rekha knew the words of Kalima Shahada , thanks to her upbringing in UAE. She went close to Beevathu’s bed chanted into her ears, “ La ilaha illallah Muhammadur rasulullah ”.

The Sower And The Divine Design

  The parable of the sower, Mark 4: 1-20, makes us existentially grounded in an age when people get concerned, nervous, and even panic attacks because they or their students and children do not achieve 100 percent every time. Jesus tells us a parable about our existence. This parable consoles me many times. Barely about 25 percent of our instances and talents bear fruit; that too sometimes 30 fold, some times 60 fold, some times 90 fold, and very few times a 100 fold. And that is okay. Jesus never condemns it. He makes us understand it. We live in an age of distraction; whether we like it or not information flow into our rooms and into our heads through television channels, Internet etc. Our plans and programme have no place; our plans get crushed, carried away, dried up. In the words of the parable, the Word of God, which has 100 percent potency, suffers a great set back. In the final analysis, only 25 percent of our day, only 25 percent of our talents, Only 25 percent of our money, o

Instil in People Peace and Love.

  When Jesus told his disciples that he was going away, they had mixed feelings. One of the prominent feelings as Jesus noticed was fear. Firstly, they were afraid of losing their master, and as a result their position of being the apostles, they had slowly began enjoying being with Jesus. Secondly, they may have been guilty and sad that they could not reach up to the expectations of their master. They were afraid. What is noteworthy is the response of Jesus, “Do not be afraid.” Jesus was a man of empathy. He had the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. As the disciples were a bit guilty, scared and down, Jesus could have easily made them more frightened, more guilt-ridden. Instead of taking a condescending position, he stands with them, comforting them. In our spiritual activities, preaching, and ministry, we find people, who have sinned, failed, and thus not having enough confidence to look up. Do not further frighten them with a god who is a judge and executer; d

Psychopathology and Leadership

 The article,  Psychopathology Among Bureaucrats Is Bigger Threat Than Corruption , by Prasanth Nair examines the concerning prevalence of psychopathy among bureaucrats, which the author argues poses a greater threat to society than outright corruption. Nair cites research suggesting the incidence of psychopathic traits is significantly higher among corporate and government leaders compared to the general population. It presents the view that psychopathy, a mental illness marked by a deficit of empathy and an inclination for manipulative and antisocial behaviour, is pervasive within the bureaucratic establishment. The article outlines the classic characteristics of "accomplished villains" - psychopathic individuals who are egocentric, antisocial, and lacking in empathy. Drawing on the work of criminal psychologist Robert Hare, Nair describes how these toxic personality traits manifest through manipulative behaviors, disregard for the rights of others, and a conspicuous absenc

Departures From Democracy

 The article Global Democracy: A Crisis of Hope? By Indrajit Roy presents a critical examination of the concept of democracy, highlighting how it is often reduced to the mere conduct of elections, disregarding its deeper essence of embracing dissent and addressing the needs of marginalised groups. It argues that democracy is increasingly facing threats from various authoritarian tendencies, such as the concentration of power in the hands of social and economic elites, the marginalisation of vulnerable social groups, and the erosion of social justice. The text delves into historical examples, drawing parallels between contemporary challenges and past instances of democratic backsliding. It underscores the importance of safeguarding the participation of the "worst-off social groups" in the political process, as opposed to the dominance of the ruling caste-class elite. The author further highlights the disparity between the grand expectations of nation-builders and the current