Skip to main content

Indian Political Spectrum: Left, Right, and Centre

 Left-wing, right-wing, and centre are terms used to describe different positions on the political spectrum. The terms left-wing and right-wing originated from the seating arrangements in the French National Assembly during the French Revolution (1789). Supporters of the King and the traditional social order sat on the president's right side. These were generally considered more conservative and resistant to change. Supporters of the revolution and those advocating for a more egalitarian society sat on the president's left side. These were seen as more progressive and willing to challenge the status quo. Over time, these seating positions became symbolic of broader political viewpoints. The terms "left" and "right" were eventually used to describe the entire spectrum of political ideologies, not just those present during the French Revolution.

Left Wing focuses on equality, social justice, and reform. Left-wing ideologies generally believe in reducing economic inequality and increasing government intervention in the economy to achieve social goals. They hold on to values such us, freedom, fraternity, rights, progress, internationalism. They often advocate for a strong social safety net, progressive taxation, and government programs to address issues like poverty and healthcare.

Right Wing focuses on individual liberty, tradition, and limited government intervention in the economy. Right-wing ideologies generally believe in free markets, minimal government regulation, and a strong national identity. They hold on to values such as, order, hierarchy, duty, tradition, nationalism. They often support policies that promote economic growth, lower taxes, and a strong national defense.

political spectrum, indian political spectrum, right wing left wing politics in india, indian politics, gandhiji,
Centre focuses on finding a balance between left-wing and right-wing ideas. Centre-wing and centre-left ideologies aim for a mix of social welfare programs and economic growth. They hold on to values such as, pragmatism, compromise, stability. They may support some level of government intervention but also encourage private sector participation.

The Spectrum of Governance: Left, Right, and Centre in Indian Politics

India, the world's largest democracy, boasts a vibrant political landscape. Within this landscape, parties and ideologies can be broadly categorised as left-wing, right-wing, and centre. Each brings distinct approaches to issues like social welfare, economic policy, and national identity.

In the Indian context, though many may disagree and disown, it is proper and beneficial to consider Gandhiji and his non-violence (Ahimsa) as the political centre; because at the extreme right and at the extreme left we see the use violence as a chosen means to achieve their goals. 

Along with Gandhiji, Nehru was centre left and Patel was centre right. The Indian National Congress was a left leaning socialist organisation as it fought the British, but post independence the congress party also has exhibited tendencies of right wing. To the proper left we have the Communist Party of India and Communist Party of India (Marxist). To the extreme left of the political spectrum we have the Naxalites, and the banned Maoists.

indian politics, left wing politics, right wing politics, political spectrum, left, right, centre politics.

To the right of the spectrum we have the Bharatiya Janata Party. Right-wing ideology emphasises economic liberalism, minimal government intervention, and a strong national identity. The BJP promotes policies like deregulation, privatisation, and fostering a competitive business environment. They advocate for social conservatism and a more assertive role for India on the world stage. On the far right we have the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a Hindu nationalist organisation, and on the extreme right we have other parties upholding Hindutva, absolute government (authoritarianism), nationalism, and ultra-nationalism. India also has the presence of parties upholding Muslim moderate, and at times, fundamentalist ideologies.

The balance of power between left, right, and centre keeps shifting. The rise of the BJP in recent years reflects a growing emphasis on economic development and nationalism. However, concerns about rising inequality and social issues ensure that left-wing ideas remain relevant. The centre space is likely to continue playing a crucial role in forging compromises and ensuring political stability.

Conclusion

Left, right, and centre in Indian politics represent a spectrum of approaches to governance. Each ideology offers valuable perspectives on national development. Understanding these diverse viewpoints is essential to navigating the complexities of Indian democracy. As the nation progresses, the interplay between these forces will continue to shape its future.

It’s important to note that a simplified representation of left, right, and centre will not do justice in understanding the complex political landscape of India . Parties may not always adhere strictly to one position on the spectrum, and there’s a significant role played by regional parties with their own unique agendas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Awesomeness Vs. Negativity

 Some people are awesome. You know them by their presence. They bring happiness wherever they go. They stand with those who do good. They promote and recognise others’ thoughts and contribution. They appreciate people. They attempt to find answers and solutions to questions and problems. Others doing better and bigger things do not threaten or make them insecure. The opposite of awesomeness in social conduct is negativity. Stay away from people who have a question for every answer; and has a problem with every solution you find. Jesus went around doing good in every possible manner: he healed the sick, he fed the hungry. The Pharisees definitely felt threatened and insecure. They try to act out their authority (Mark 8:11-13); and asked Jesus for a heavenly sign. Jesus’ mind and ministry did not get stuck in the negativities around him. He did not get sucked into the drama the Pharisees were staging. He sighed and got on to the other shore. There he continued to do good. Jesus gives t

We Come Across A Challenge Only Once

 The apostles of Jesus were listening and conversing with him at the farewell discourse of Jesus (John 14-17). He told them a lot of things which made sense to them, they were happy to hear those gracious words, like, a lesson on love –love one another as I have loved you – some of them, even asked further questions and learn more theories of it; I will not leave you orphans, I will go and send you another helper; I will go, I will take you also to the place where I am going, etc. And as he was talking, he also also told them, “After a little while you will not see me…” (John 16: 16-20). Now they wake up, and ask one another, what is he saying? What does he mean by ‘a little while’? Is everything going to change? We fancy every word of the gospel and scriptures. We fancy faith, we fancy religion, we fancy love, mercy, reconciliation, inclusivity, etc. But not now –we don't want to do it now. All want to die and go to heaven, for we fancy heaven so much –but not now.  We constantly

Inter-religious Sensitivity in the Time of Covid-19

  I was religiously pleased and humanly excited to read the story of a Hindu doctor reciting Kalima Shahada for a dying Muslim Covid patient in Kerala. Beevathu, 56 year old, was all isolated from her family in a covid ward. She had been there for 17 days, she was on a ventilator, and it was increasingly clear that there was no hope. After the consent from her family she was taken off from the ventilator. Beevathu lies there between life and death. Nothing more to happen. But like any good dying Muslim, she perhaps wanted to hear the Kalima Shahada (the Islamic oath of faith) to be chanted to her by one of her family members; but there was none, the situation made it so. Dr. Rekha, a Hindu doctor, was attending to her all these days. She knew what was happening, and she also knew what was not happening. Dr. Rekha knew the words of Kalima Shahada , thanks to her upbringing in UAE. She went close to Beevathu’s bed chanted into her ears, “ La ilaha illallah Muhammadur rasulullah ”.

The Sower And The Divine Design

  The parable of the sower, Mark 4: 1-20, makes us existentially grounded in an age when people get concerned, nervous, and even panic attacks because they or their students and children do not achieve 100 percent every time. Jesus tells us a parable about our existence. This parable consoles me many times. Barely about 25 percent of our instances and talents bear fruit; that too sometimes 30 fold, some times 60 fold, some times 90 fold, and very few times a 100 fold. And that is okay. Jesus never condemns it. He makes us understand it. We live in an age of distraction; whether we like it or not information flow into our rooms and into our heads through television channels, Internet etc. Our plans and programme have no place; our plans get crushed, carried away, dried up. In the words of the parable, the Word of God, which has 100 percent potency, suffers a great set back. In the final analysis, only 25 percent of our day, only 25 percent of our talents, Only 25 percent of our money, o

Instil in People Peace and Love.

  When Jesus told his disciples that he was going away, they had mixed feelings. One of the prominent feelings as Jesus noticed was fear. Firstly, they were afraid of losing their master, and as a result their position of being the apostles, they had slowly began enjoying being with Jesus. Secondly, they may have been guilty and sad that they could not reach up to the expectations of their master. They were afraid. What is noteworthy is the response of Jesus, “Do not be afraid.” Jesus was a man of empathy. He had the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. As the disciples were a bit guilty, scared and down, Jesus could have easily made them more frightened, more guilt-ridden. Instead of taking a condescending position, he stands with them, comforting them. In our spiritual activities, preaching, and ministry, we find people, who have sinned, failed, and thus not having enough confidence to look up. Do not further frighten them with a god who is a judge and executer; d

Psychopathology and Leadership

 The article,  Psychopathology Among Bureaucrats Is Bigger Threat Than Corruption , by Prasanth Nair examines the concerning prevalence of psychopathy among bureaucrats, which the author argues poses a greater threat to society than outright corruption. Nair cites research suggesting the incidence of psychopathic traits is significantly higher among corporate and government leaders compared to the general population. It presents the view that psychopathy, a mental illness marked by a deficit of empathy and an inclination for manipulative and antisocial behaviour, is pervasive within the bureaucratic establishment. The article outlines the classic characteristics of "accomplished villains" - psychopathic individuals who are egocentric, antisocial, and lacking in empathy. Drawing on the work of criminal psychologist Robert Hare, Nair describes how these toxic personality traits manifest through manipulative behaviors, disregard for the rights of others, and a conspicuous absenc

Departures From Democracy

 The article Global Democracy: A Crisis of Hope? By Indrajit Roy presents a critical examination of the concept of democracy, highlighting how it is often reduced to the mere conduct of elections, disregarding its deeper essence of embracing dissent and addressing the needs of marginalised groups. It argues that democracy is increasingly facing threats from various authoritarian tendencies, such as the concentration of power in the hands of social and economic elites, the marginalisation of vulnerable social groups, and the erosion of social justice. The text delves into historical examples, drawing parallels between contemporary challenges and past instances of democratic backsliding. It underscores the importance of safeguarding the participation of the "worst-off social groups" in the political process, as opposed to the dominance of the ruling caste-class elite. The author further highlights the disparity between the grand expectations of nation-builders and the current