S. Somanath, the ISRO's Director, was in the midst of an interview, when the interviewer asked him about the experience of controlling a rocket from the earth station; he replied, "A launched rocket cannot be controlled. Only till countdown zero we can control it. Everything is set in it as a process, it runs as it is programmed." When Somanath uttered these words the interviewer was visibly stunned. The admission seemed almost reckless: that one of the most complex machines ever built by human hands, carrying perhaps a nation's pride and years of scientific effort, is — once launched — entirely beyond human intervention. No joystick. No remote pilot. No commander barking real-time orders from mission control. The men and women seated at their consoles, with their headsets and glowing screens, are, in Somanath's own words, only "observing anxiously at what is being unfolded."
And yet, the rocket flies. It corrects its own trajectory. It separates its stages at precisely the right altitude. It places a satellite into an orbit calculated years in advance. It does all of this not because a brilliant person is watching over it, but because a brilliant process was embedded into it long before it ever left the ground. This, in essence, is the most powerful argument for process-driven thinking that any organisation, whether a space agency, a hospital, a school, or a small business, could ever encounter.
The illusion of the indispensable leader is burst. Human history has a persistent romance with the exceptional individual. We name institutions after founders, credit revolutions to generals, and attribute organisational success to charismatic CEOs. There is a seductive comfort in believing that somewhere at the top, a brilliant mind is in control; watching, deciding, steering. But the ISRO example exposes this belief as, at best, incomplete. A rocket does not fail because no great engineer is guiding it in real time. It succeeds or fails based entirely on the quality of the processes designed and validated before launch. The leader's most important work was done months and years earlier; in the specification documents, the quality checklists, the test protocols, the redundancy systems, and the simulation runs. By the time the countdown reaches zero, the leader is no longer the most important variable in the equation. The process is.
This is not a diminishment of leadership. It is its highest expression. The greatest leaders in any field understand that their job is to design the system, not to perpetually operate it. Their goal is to make themselves, in a very specific sense, unnecessary — because a system that depends on any single human being for its continued functioning is a system with a critical point of failure.
What does a Process Actually Do?
A process is, at its core, a transfer of intelligence. It is the mechanism by which what a talented individual knows becomes something that the organisation does, reliably, repeatedly, and independently. When Somanath's team embedded the rocket's flight parameters into its onboard computer, they were not just programming a machine. They were transferring years of accumulated scientific wisdom into a form that could operate without its authors being present.
This transfer has several profound consequences. First, it makes performance predictable. An organisation that relies on a gifted individual will deliver outstanding results when that individual is inspired, healthy, available, and engaged; and poor results at all other times. A process-driven organisation delivers consistent results because it has removed the variable of human mood, energy, and presence from its core operations. Consistency, as any engineer or manager will affirm, is the foundation on which trust and scale are built.
Second, a well-designed process is self-correcting. The rocket does not simply execute a pre-loaded path blindly. Its sensors measure deviation from the intended trajectory and its systems make continuous micro-corrections. This closed-loop design — measure, compare, correct — is the architecture of resilience. Organisations that build similar feedback mechanisms into their workflows do not wait for a crisis to reveal their errors; they are continuously discovering and correcting small deviations before they become catastrophic ones.
Third, process enables accountability without micromanagement. When a clear process exists, deviation from it is immediately visible. There is no need for a supervisor to hover over every task. The standard itself becomes the supervisor. This creates a culture of objective measurement — one where performance is evaluated not against the personal preferences of whoever holds authority today, but against defined, agreed-upon benchmarks that exist independently of any individual.
When organisations built around exceptional individuals things appear to work magnificently. Decisions are made quickly. Results are impressive. Everyone attributes the success to the person at the top. Then the person leaves, through retirement, illness, promotion, or resignation, and the organisation discovers, often with considerable shock, that it does not actually know how the success happened. The knowledge was never externalised. The methods were never documented. The standards existed only in one person's head. What looked like organisational competence was in reality individual competence wearing the costume of a system.
This is precisely the danger Somanath's rocket metaphor illuminates from the opposite direction. Imagine if ISRO's rockets required a brilliant engineer to manually control them throughout their flight. The organisation's success would then be entirely hostage to that engineer's continued presence. One illness, one resignation, one moment of human error, and the mission fails. More dangerously still, this arrangement cannot scale. You cannot launch ten missions simultaneously if each one requires the personal attention of your best mind.
Process is what makes scale possible. Process is what makes succession possible. Process is what makes an organisation genuinely institutional; meaning, larger and more durable than any single person within it.
Process Is the Memory of an Organisation
Human memory is fallible, fragmented, and mortal. An organisation that stores its operational wisdom in the minds of its members rather than in its documented systems is one that forgets constantly; every time someone retires, every time a team changes, every time institutional memory is disrupted by transition. The lessons learned from past failures, the workarounds discovered for recurring problems, the standards that were painstakingly arrived at through trial and error, all of it evaporates if it lives only in human heads.
A rocket, by contrast, does not forget. The lessons of every prior ISRO mission, every anomaly investigated, every parameter refined, every failure understood, are embedded in the processes that govern the next launch. The organisation's accumulated wisdom is portable, transferable, and permanent in a way that human memory never can be.
Process and objectivity is the only reliable antidote to the distortions introduced by personality-driven cultures. In the absence of clear, measurable processes, organisations invariably drift toward evaluating performance based on visibility, likability, and proximity to power rather than actual results. The employee who is loudest in meetings appears more capable than the one who quietly delivers. The department that reports upward most skillfully appears more productive than the one that simply does good work. Without objective process metrics, there is no reliable mechanism for distinguishing between the two.
A rocket cannot charm its way into orbit. Either the thrust-to-weight ratio is correct, or it isn't. Either the guidance system has been calibrated to the required tolerance, or it hasn't. The physics does not care how impressive the pre-launch press conference was. This radical, unsentimental objectivity is something every organisation desperately needs and rarely achieves; and process is the tool that makes it possible.
When an organisation defines what success looks like in measurable terms, and embeds that definition into its operating procedures, it creates a reality that no amount of personality or politics can entirely override. The numbers either meet the standard, or they don't. The process was either followed, or it wasn't. This is not merely managerial good practice. It is the structural guarantee of integrity.
Build the Rocket, and Trust It
Somanath's insight is, on the surface, a statement about aerospace engineering. But it is, more profoundly, a statement about the nature of institutional excellence. The most important work of any leader, in any domain, is the work done before the launch; the painstaking design of systems, standards, and processes that will continue to function faithfully long after the leader has stepped away from the console.
A team that can only succeed when its best person is watching is not yet a team. It is a collection of individuals orbiting a single point of competence. A rocket that required a human pilot at every moment would never reach space. An organisation that requires a singular genius at every moment will never scale, never sustain, and never truly endure.
The goal, in rocketry as in institution-building, is to do the hard, unglamorous, invisible work of design; and then, at the moment of launch, to trust the process completely. Because once the rocket leaves the pad, no one can steer it. And the only thing that was ever truly in control was the quality of thought that went into building it.
Comments
Post a Comment