A quote on existential life goes like this, you are a rose –a beautiful rose, but people love lilies. There is a particular kind of suffering that has no name in most languages; the suffering of being exactly what the world actually in need of, and being rejected for it. You offer a rose. They want a lily. You hold out your open hand. They prefer the closed fist.
This is not ordinary rejection. Ordinary rejection wounds the ego. This kind of rejection wounds something deeper, it strikes at the very substance of what you are. You cannot stop being a rose to become a lily. You cannot unmake your own nature. And so you stand, fully yourself, in a world that looks past you, through you, around you, searching for the very opposite of what you embody. Jesus knew this pain with perfect clarity. And in John 3:16–21, He did not flinch from naming it.
Verse 19 is one of the most quietly devastating sentences ever written, Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light. The Light arrived. The evidence was presented. And humanity, in its freedom, chose darkness.
This is an existential pain: you are forgiveness and acceptance, people prefer judgement and condemnation; you are love, people look for hatred, revenge, and war; you are light, people prefer darkness. Why?
Why Do People Choose Darkness? Jesus gives the reason, and it is as true today as it was then: because their deeds were evil. He is saying that darkness is comfortable and more familiar. Darkness does not require you to change. Light, by its nature, reveals. And revelation is painful when what is being revealed is the gap between what you are and what is expected of you.
What do you do? Here is where the real profundity of Jesus' response comes, and it is easy to miss because it is so quiet. He did not stop being light. The rose did not become a lily. There is a kind of person who, rejected for their gentleness, eventually hardens. The highest love is not conditional on being received. It gives because giving is its nature, not because giving guarantees return.
Consider Albert Camus' image of Sisyphus—not the same theology, but a parallel existential posture—the man who rolls the stone up the hill knowing it will roll down again, evertheless continues to roll the stone up everyday. Camus said we must imagine Sisyphus happy, because the defiance of meaninglessness is itself the meaning. Jesus is something greater: not defiant, but faithful. He is not rolling the stone in rebellion against an absurd universe. He is carrying the cross because love, by its very logic, goes all the way.
He walked alone; not metaphorically alone. Literally. His disciples slept in Gethsemane. One betrayed him with a kiss — the gesture of intimacy converted into the instrument of abandonment. The crowds who waved palms became the crowd that cried for Barabbas. Even on the cross, the cry: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" —the human experience of divine absence pressed to its uttermost limit.
The Light does not pursue, does not coerce, does not manipulate; neither does it extinguish itself. It simply remains — present, available, patient — so that "whoever comes to the light" may find it still burning.

Comments
Post a Comment