Skip to main content

The Last Supper and the Washing of the Feet | John 13: 1-15

 Here we are standing in the silent shadow of impending sacrifice, Jesus did not just talk about love; he showed that love is a verb that requires us to get our hands dirty for the sake of others. In that quiet, humble moment, he taught us that no one is too important to serve, and no one is too broken to be served.

The Company Jesus Kept

There is something worth pausing over before anything else is said: the company Jesus chose to keep on the last night of his life. He had been arrested, in the eyes of the religious establishment, for precisely this crime; eating with sinners, tax collectors, the disreputable, the morally compromised. Matthew, Mark, and Luke all record the scandal of it. And yet here, in the upper room, on the very night before the cross, he does not surround himself with the devout or the dignified. He gathers, one last time, with his disciples — men who will, before morning, betray him, deny him, and run. He knew this. He knew all of it. And he stayed at the table.

In Les MisĂ©rables, Victor Hugo gives us a moment of similar moral architecture. Bishop Myriel receives Jean Valjean, an ex-convict, a man society has entirely given up on, is made to sit at his table as an honoured guest, and calls him “my brother.” When Valjean steals the silver in the night and is brought back by the police, the bishop tells the officers that the silver was a gift. He then gives Valjean the candlesticks too, the most precious things he owns. “You forgot these,” he says quietly.

It is this kind of table, one that costs the host something, that Jesus is hosting in the upper room. King David understood this instinct for costly love. When he wished to make an offering to God, and a man named Araunah offered his threshing floor freely, David refused the gift. David said, “I will not offer burnt offerings to the Lord my God that cost me nothing” (2 Samuel 24:24). The Last Supper is an offering that will cost everything. That is the nature of Eucharist. That is the nature of love that does not calculate.

Jesus Washed Their Feet

After the meal has begun, Jesus gets up from the table, removes his outer robe, ties a towel around his waist, fills a basin with water, and begins to wash his disciples’ feet. To understand what is happening, you have to understand what was not happening. In the ancient world, foot-washing was assigned to the lowest servant in a household; and not just any servant; Jewish law considered the task too degrading even for a Hebrew slave. It was the work of the outsider, the foreigner, the one with nothing left to lose. Jesus, the one they called Rabbi, Lord, the one some believed would restore a kingdom, takes that position. On the floor, one pair of feet at a time.

Peter’s Protest

When Jesus reaches Simon Peter, Peter pulls his feet back. “You shall never wash my feet,” he says. It is the protest of a man who loves his teacher deeply and cannot make the image fit. We understand Peter. There is a kind of violence in receiving grace you feel you have not earned; it unravels the careful scaffolding of self-sufficiency we build to stay upright. Hugo’s Jean Valjean knows something of this. Hardened by nineteen years in prison, he has learned to receive nothing without suspicion. Peter does not yet understand what Jesus is doing. Most of us still don’t, not fully; for we have don't usually see it happening.

Judas was in the room. This is the detail that refuses to settle. Jesus knew; the Gospel of John is clear, that he knew who would betray him, knew it before the evening began. And he washed Judas’s feet too. He did not withhold the gesture. He did not linger over it with cold efficiency. He washed them.

There is a deep theology of reconciliation embedded here. Jesus had taught that before you bring your gift to the altar, you must first go and be reconciled to your brother. The text is, “if your brother has something against you, leave the gift and go” (Matthew 5:23–24). The washing of feet is that reconciliation made visible. It is the going first, without waiting to be asked, without waiting to see if it will be received.

Dostoevsky, in one of the most quietly devastating scenes in all of Russian literature, In Crime and Punishment, there is a parallel to the washing of the feet of Judas.

Rodion Raskolnikov is a young, brilliant, desperate poor student in St Petersburg who has talked himself into a terrible idea. He has constructed a philosophy; cold, logical, and entirely self-serving, that certain extraordinary men are above the moral law that governs ordinary people. Napoleon, he reasons, crossed rivers of blood to remake the world, and history called him great. Why should a man of sufficient intellect not do the same, on a smaller scale, for a sufficient reason? And so Raskolnikov takes an axe and murders an old pawnbroker, a woman he has convinced himself is a parasite on society. Then, in a panic, he murders the pawnbroker's innocent half-sister too, who simply had the misfortune of walking in. The novel is the story of what the murder does to him; not the legal consequences, those come later. The killing does not make him feel like Napoleon. It makes him feel like a man buried alive. He becomes feverish, erratic, consumed by a guilt he refuses to name, cornered by his own mind. He is in a tomb of his own making, and he cannot find the door.

Sonya Marmeladova is, in every outward sense, his opposite. She is the daughter of a broken, alcoholic civil servant, a man who drinks the family into ruin. To keep her stepmother and younger siblings from starving, Sonya has been driven into prostitution. She did not choose this life. It was chosen for her by poverty, by a father who could not hold himself together, by a world that offered a young woman with nothing but few options. She carries a yellow permit, the official document that marks her as a registered prostitute in Tsarist Russia, and she carries it alongside a worn New Testament. Both things are true of her at once. She has been broken by the world and she has not been extinguished by it.

Raskolnikov is drawn to her. He senses in her someone who also lives outside the ordinary boundaries, though for entirely different reasons. He goes to her room, in a building where the ceilings are low and the wallpaper is peeling, and he tells her what he has done. He confesses the murders to her before he confesses them to anyone else. Sonya does not recoil. She does not call the police. She does not deliver a speech about justice. She reaches for her New Testament; the same one she has read until its pages are soft, and she reads to him the story of Lazarus. She is reluctant at first, feeling somehow unworthy to read it aloud. But she reads. Her voice gains strength as she goes. "Lazarus, come forth." And he who had been dead four days came out. She is reading resurrection to a man who has entombed himself. She is sitting in a rented room with a murderer and offering him, not condemnation, but a second chance.

example, testimony.

It is, in its own way, a washing of feet. Not the removal of physical dirt, but the refusal to treat another human being as beyond the reach of grace. Sonya has no power, no standing, no social currency of any kind. She has nothing to give Raskolnikov except her presence and her worn New Testament. And it is exactly enough. Years later, in the epilogue, in a Siberian prison camp where Raskolnikov has been sent, it is Sonya who follows him. It is before her feet that he finally weeps and begins, at last, to live again. Dostoevsky believed; with the conviction of a man who had himself faced a mock execution and spent four years in a Siberian labour camp that no human soul is too far-gone. That the turning point is rarely because of an argument, or piece of faith; it is almost always a person: someone who stays, someone who reads resurrection aloud in a small room where the air smells of poverty and shame, and someone who kneels to wash another’s feet.

Washing of the feet is Jesus saying with water and towel, I have nothing against you. Whatever comes next, I have met you here, at your lowest point, at your dirtiest point, and I have not condemned you.

Power, as we have always known it, flows downward. The king commands. The general orders. The master instructs. Even in our kinder institutions, authority announces itself from above. But in the basin and the towel, authority moves in the opposite direction — it descends, it serves, it touches what is dirty and does not recoil. The one with the most power in the room takes the lowest position in the room. Not as a performance of modesty. But as a revelation of what he believes power is for.

The Breaking of the Bread

The washing of feet was not the whole of the evening. It was the preparation for what came next. After Jesus has moved around the table, after every pair of feet has been held in his hands, he puts his robe back on and sits down. Then he takes bread, gives thanks, breaks it, and says: “This is my body, given for you.” He takes a cup of wine and says: “This is my blood of the covenant, poured out for many.”

Eucharist is Eucharist precisely because it comes after the feet have been washed. The reconciliation precedes the meal. The going down comes before the offering. You cannot understand what he is doing at the table without first understanding what he did on the floor.

Do You Understand What I Have Done?

After everything; the washing, the bread, the wine, Jesus asks a question, “Do you understand what I have done to you?” It is one of the most searching questions in all of Scripture. Understanding is not automatic; it may take time, perhaps a lifetime, to arrive at its full meaning. The disciples did not understand that night. Peter would deny Jesus three times before dawn. Thomas would doubt. They would all scatter. Understanding is not the same as agreement in the moment. It is something that grows slowly, in the dark, like a seed.

Victor Hugo traces this slow growth in Valjean. The bishop’s grace does not transform him instantly. It plants something. It takes years, failures, further descents, and incremental choices before the man the bishop saw in him begins to fully emerge. Grace is not magic; have patience.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Year, New Beginning

 The past year was different to different people. Some of us were very successful, won every battle we fought. Some others of us did not win every battle that we fought, might have found difficult even to get up from bed everyday, we just survived. But for both it is a new year. For those very successful, it is time to stand on the ground and not be overconfident, complacent, arrogant and egoistic. And it is also time to give back. And for those of us not very successful we have another new year with 365 blank pages, 365 blank days. It is a fresh new beginning. Start your dream and go all the way. “There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth—not going all the way, and not starting”, said Buddha. Every New Year tells that we cannot eternally postpone important things in our lives. We must begin somewhere. How many lives do we have on this earth? One, two, three, four, or more? One of the foremost thinkers and philosophers of China, Confucius, four centuries before ...

2025 Must Create Its Own Art

  People are afraid of art, because real art brings the question and the answer into your house.   Tonight’s art becomes inadequate
and useless when the sun rises in
the morning. The mistake lies not in creating art for tonight, but in assuming tonight’s answers will serve tomorrow’s questions. Louise Bourgeois, a French American artist, reflected, “art is a guaranty of sanity;” but that guarantee must be renewed with each dawn, each cultural shift, and
each evolution of human consciousness. If some art endures through generations, it
is only because of its capacity to speak, its ability to demand fresh interpretations that test and challenge the new. To guarantee sanity in the coming year, 2025 must create
its own art. Why create art? Why watch art? Why read literature? True art, in the words of Sunil P Ilayidam, shakes that which is rigid and unchangeable. Art serves as humanity’s persistent earthquake, destabilising comfortable certainties and creating space
for new ways of...

Fine Ways of Disregarding Vital Issues

 Observing the preoccupations of Pharisees, scribes and religious leaders of his time (Mark 7: 1-23) Jesus commended that they have fine ways of disregarding the commandments of God in order to maintain human traditions and interests. They put aside weightier matters to uphold human decrees. In modern politics we hear the jargon, ‘politics of distraction’. In a country of mass illiteracy and unemployment, farmers’ suicide, etc. politicians and other key people divert public attention by discussing building temples, girls wearing hijab to college, etc. Noam Chomsky, an American social commentator says, “The key element of social control is the strategy of distraction that is to divert public attention from important issues and changes decided by political and economic elites, through the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.” The corrupt politicians must have learned this strategy from the pickpockets (or is it visa versa): they di...

Human Empowerment Vs Technological Determinism

 This article, Seeking truth in a barrage of biases , presents an inspiring call to action for maintaining our intellectual autonomy in the digital age. Written by J Jehoson Jiresh, it addresses the critical challenge of navigating through algorithmic biases and misinformation while offering hope and practical solutions. The author beautifully frames our modern predicament - how even a simple online search for running shoes can shape our digital landscape - and transforms this everyday observation into a powerful message about reclaiming our agency in the digital world. What's particularly inspiring is the article's emphasis on human empowerment rather than technological determinism. The article presents three key strategies for hope and change: Active critical engagement to question assumptions and challenge biases Seeking diverse perspectives to break free from our echo chambers Demanding transparency and accountability in algorithmic systems Most uplifting is the article...

Zacchaeus’ Last Will

 Zacchaeus, as we know, was a chief tax collector and a rich man (Luke 19: 1-10). He, as any tax collectors of his time would do, used to collect much more than due, even by force and violence. Now we might say, in a very self-justifying manner, that I am not a tax collector, thus this gospel does not concern my life and me. The figures of a survey done on taxes; taxpayers and tax collectors could be quite embarrassing. 72% people do not pay taxes fully or partially. They cheat the country and the government. 26% of people pay the full tax, not because they love their country and its development but because of fear of being caught and punished; they are in a search of completely safe ways of evading taxes. The rest 2% are involved in collecting taxes. They cheat the country and people by collecting more and not correctly accounting for it. That leaves us with a 100% of ‘Zacchaeuses’ in our societies. Thus most of us stand in need of salvation for our families and ourselves. Zacchae...

Religion Must Help Greater Acceptance And Not Control

  What if you see people who never came to your church or never were part of the universal Church found with God; forgiven by god, loved by god, helped by god, and even pampered by god? Our average human spirit and mind will feel a bit of discomfort and repulsion. That exactly is what is happening with apostle John in Mark 9: 38-41. Membership in a religion in many phases in history, and religious practices like praying, church-going etc. has become tools and means of exercising superiority and control over others, or it becomes a means to exclude people. In the name of religion and religious practices we take control of what can be done, who can do it, what is good and bad, what is moral and what is immoral. This approach creates an exclusive moral, good, pure, and authentic race or people or group. We keep doing it as individuals and institutions for the fear of losing control over others. And that is the end of humanity. Stopping others from doing good comes from a sickening clo...

Great Teachers Create Vocal Students

 Picture a classroom where questions are met with impatience, where unique perspectives are dismissed, where vulnerable thoughts are cut short. Gradually, hands stop rising, eyes avoid contact, and the once-vibrant space becomes a vacuum of missed opportunities and untapped potential. This silence is not respect—it is retreat, it is a silent protest, and it is dissent. When teachers fail to listen, they unwittingly construct invisible barriers. Students quickly sense when their contributions hold no value, when their voices are merely tolerated rather than treasured. The natural response is self-preservation through silence. Why risk sharing when no one is truly receiving? This silent classroom is a warning sign. A teacher who does not listen will soon be surrounded by students who do not speak. Andy Stanley has spoken about it on leadership, "a leader who does not listen will gradually  be surrounded by people who do not speak." It is true in every field, including educatio...

Inter-religious Sensitivity in the Time of Covid-19

  I was religiously pleased and humanly excited to read the story of a Hindu doctor reciting Kalima Shahada for a dying Muslim Covid patient in Kerala. Beevathu, 56 year old, was all isolated from her family in a covid ward. She had been there for 17 days, she was on a ventilator, and it was increasingly clear that there was no hope. After the consent from her family she was taken off from the ventilator. Beevathu lies there between life and death. Nothing more to happen. But like any good dying Muslim, she perhaps wanted to hear the Kalima Shahada (the Islamic oath of faith) to be chanted to her by one of her family members; but there was none, the situation made it so. Dr. Rekha, a Hindu doctor, was attending to her all these days. She knew what was happening, and she also knew what was not happening. Dr. Rekha knew the words of Kalima Shahada , thanks to her upbringing in UAE. She went close to Beevathu’s bed chanted into her ears, “ La ilaha illallah Muhammadur rasulullah...

Jesus Sends Seventy-Two To Meet And Get Transformed

 For a person of faith, ‘God comes, ever comes’ is a constant experience; logically, it also means that God goes, ever goes to the other. We read in Romans, “God came to save us when we were still sinners.” At another point of time in history we were the other to whom God came.  Throughout his earthly journey, Jesus demonstrated a radical commitment to crossing boundaries, meeting others. This wasn't merely a strategy for spreading his message—it was a fundamental aspect of his vision for humanity. He didn't establish a comfortable base and wait for people to come to him. Instead, he was constantly moving—crossing territorial boundaries, cultural divides, and social barriers. He didn't try to change people from a distance through arguments or condemnation. He shared meals with tax collectors, conversed with Samaritan women, touched lepers, and welcomed children. Each encounter was an act of radical hospitality that said, you matter and your story matters. Jesus didn't k...