Skip to main content

Maundy Thursday | John 13: 1-15

 From the reading, John 13: 1-15, and the actions that are unfolding around us, we could reflect upon two significant events: Jesus washing the feet of his disciples and the Last Supper.

Jesus washing the feet of his disciples

After the meal has begun, Jesus breaks the feast to draw maximum importance and focus to something that he thought as important as his suffering and death. Jesus gets up from the table, removes his outer robe, ties a towel around his waist, fills a basin with water, and begins to wash his disciples’ feet. In the ancient world, foot-washing was assigned to the lowest servant in a household; and not just any servant; Jewish law considered the task too degrading even for a Hebrew slave. It was the work of the outsider, the foreigner, the one with nothing left to lose. Jesus, the one they called Rabbi, Lord, the one some believed would restore a kingdom, takes that position on the floor, one pair of feet at a time.

washing of feet, last supper, maundy thursday,
Washing of another’s feet is an antidote; it is a cure, it is corrective measure. Let me explain it with an example.

The essence of KM Gaffoor’s Malayalam poem Yudham (War) could be translated this way: over small things, we lose our patience and cool, we grow in anger and revenge. When the food had a little less salt, we struck the table in frustration, and pushed the plate away violently. When someone gave a harsh feedback we banged the door so hard. When a glass slipped and shattered, we raised our hands in punishment. Over small things—a meal, a feedback, a mistake—we became storms. ‘This is us.’

And then we, seeing the horrors of war, ask, what is war?  Why is there war? KM Gaffoor answers it plainly: ‘War is simply us, made larger.’ War is not something that happens out there, between nations and armies and strangers on maps. War is something that happens in here—in the kitchen, at the dinner table, in the spaces between people who are supposed to live with each other.

When we read the gospel of John, Jesus knew exactly who was going to betray him, who was going to deny him, and that no one would remain with him at the crucial hour, they would run away. Jesus does not recoil, shrink or withdraw. He does not accuse, challenge, or punish; rather he bends down to wash their feet.

This washing of the feet could be understood two ways. Firstly, it is to say that I have nothing against you. I have met you at your lowest moment, I know what would happen; but I hold nothing against you. You have a complete second chance to begin your life. In Matthew 5: 23-24, we have heard Jesus saying, when you offer your gifts at the altar, and you realise that your brother has something against you, go reconcile and come back, and then offer gifts. It was also preparation for the first holy Eucharist.

Secondly, washing of the feet is a nonjudgmental act—it is forgiveness. We can see its parallel in John 8, the story of a woman caught in sin. Jesus does not condemn her. Jesus forgives her. Forgiveness is washing of the feet. Though this incident of the washing of the feet is kept for the last, it was not an isolated incident; all through the gospels we find events parallel to the washing of the feet.

The Last Supper

Gospels do not use the word ‘Last Supper’. It comes to us from art, literature, and popular culture. The word perhaps is ‘Passover’, or theologically, the institution of the Eucharist, and consequently, the priesthood.

There is something worth pausing over before anything else is said: the company Jesus chose to keep on the last night of his life. He had been arrested, in the eyes of the religious establishment, for precisely this crime; eating with sinners, tax collectors, the disreputable, the morally compromised. Matthew, Mark, and Luke all record the scandal of it. And yet here, in the upper room, on the very night before the cross, he does not surround himself with the devout or the dignified. He gathers, one last time, with his disciples — men who will, before morning, betray him, deny him, and run. He knew this. He knew all of it. And he stayed at the table. There are a lot of discussions about who all must have been at the table? Would there be any women? Would there be Mary? Knowing the Jesus of the gospels, I find no difficulty in believing that there would have been more people.

The disciples of Jesus, who as they walked with Jesus on the dusty roads of Palestine had to be satisfied with quietly plucked grains from the cornfields along the paths and maybe a few crumbs given by some generous women, now lost perhaps in the mesmerizing aroma and taste of the yummy dishes and drink, may not be really aware of what is taking place among them and what is happening around them in Jerusalem; and what will happen to them in the hours to come. But in the midst of them sat Jesus: fully aware of what is happening among them, fully aware of what is happening in and around Jerusalem, and fully aware of what will happen to him in the hours to come.

Jesus knows it is his last meal with his loved ones; his life on earth was just 33 years old, had he lived enough? He painfully knows that the majority of seeds that he had sown had been taken away by birds, had been choked by thorns and killed by the heat and hardness of stones. He painfully knows that he has no shoulders to put his head on and cry; perhaps it is significant that within an hour or two he will be crying with his head on a cold hard rock in a lonely garden. The man who wanted to gather everyone as his children as a hen gathers its chicks under its wings is left all alone.

Having washed their feet, Jesus returns to the table, takes the bread, breaks and sheds himself, symbolically in the form of bread and wine. And celebrates a happy thanksgiving—Eucharist. Jesus knew what was ahead. He knew the garden, the arrest, the denial, and the cross; still he took the bread, and he gave thanks. The whole sacrament is named after a moment of gratitude in the middle of darkness. This is the deepest secret of that moment, and perhaps the hardest: Jesus gives thanks, not because suffering is good, not because it does not pain him; but because to give thanks is to refuse to let darkness have the final word.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Year, New Beginning

 The past year was different to different people. Some of us were very successful, won every battle we fought. Some others of us did not win every battle that we fought, might have found difficult even to get up from bed everyday, we just survived. But for both it is a new year. For those very successful, it is time to stand on the ground and not be overconfident, complacent, arrogant and egoistic. And it is also time to give back. And for those of us not very successful we have another new year with 365 blank pages, 365 blank days. It is a fresh new beginning. Start your dream and go all the way. “There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth—not going all the way, and not starting”, said Buddha. Every New Year tells that we cannot eternally postpone important things in our lives. We must begin somewhere. How many lives do we have on this earth? One, two, three, four, or more? One of the foremost thinkers and philosophers of China, Confucius, four centuries before ...

2025 Must Create Its Own Art

  People are afraid of art, because real art brings the question and the answer into your house.   Tonight’s art becomes inadequate
and useless when the sun rises in
the morning. The mistake lies not in creating art for tonight, but in assuming tonight’s answers will serve tomorrow’s questions. Louise Bourgeois, a French American artist, reflected, “art is a guaranty of sanity;” but that guarantee must be renewed with each dawn, each cultural shift, and
each evolution of human consciousness. If some art endures through generations, it
is only because of its capacity to speak, its ability to demand fresh interpretations that test and challenge the new. To guarantee sanity in the coming year, 2025 must create
its own art. Why create art? Why watch art? Why read literature? True art, in the words of Sunil P Ilayidam, shakes that which is rigid and unchangeable. Art serves as humanity’s persistent earthquake, destabilising comfortable certainties and creating space
for new ways of...

Fine Ways of Disregarding Vital Issues

 Observing the preoccupations of Pharisees, scribes and religious leaders of his time (Mark 7: 1-23) Jesus commended that they have fine ways of disregarding the commandments of God in order to maintain human traditions and interests. They put aside weightier matters to uphold human decrees. In modern politics we hear the jargon, ‘politics of distraction’. In a country of mass illiteracy and unemployment, farmers’ suicide, etc. politicians and other key people divert public attention by discussing building temples, girls wearing hijab to college, etc. Noam Chomsky, an American social commentator says, “The key element of social control is the strategy of distraction that is to divert public attention from important issues and changes decided by political and economic elites, through the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.” The corrupt politicians must have learned this strategy from the pickpockets (or is it visa versa): they di...

Human Empowerment Vs Technological Determinism

 This article, Seeking truth in a barrage of biases , presents an inspiring call to action for maintaining our intellectual autonomy in the digital age. Written by J Jehoson Jiresh, it addresses the critical challenge of navigating through algorithmic biases and misinformation while offering hope and practical solutions. The author beautifully frames our modern predicament - how even a simple online search for running shoes can shape our digital landscape - and transforms this everyday observation into a powerful message about reclaiming our agency in the digital world. What's particularly inspiring is the article's emphasis on human empowerment rather than technological determinism. The article presents three key strategies for hope and change: Active critical engagement to question assumptions and challenge biases Seeking diverse perspectives to break free from our echo chambers Demanding transparency and accountability in algorithmic systems Most uplifting is the article...

Zacchaeus’ Last Will

 Zacchaeus, as we know, was a chief tax collector and a rich man (Luke 19: 1-10). He, as any tax collectors of his time would do, used to collect much more than due, even by force and violence. Now we might say, in a very self-justifying manner, that I am not a tax collector, thus this gospel does not concern my life and me. The figures of a survey done on taxes; taxpayers and tax collectors could be quite embarrassing. 72% people do not pay taxes fully or partially. They cheat the country and the government. 26% of people pay the full tax, not because they love their country and its development but because of fear of being caught and punished; they are in a search of completely safe ways of evading taxes. The rest 2% are involved in collecting taxes. They cheat the country and people by collecting more and not correctly accounting for it. That leaves us with a 100% of ‘Zacchaeuses’ in our societies. Thus most of us stand in need of salvation for our families and ourselves. Zacchae...

Religion Must Help Greater Acceptance And Not Control

  What if you see people who never came to your church or never were part of the universal Church found with God; forgiven by god, loved by god, helped by god, and even pampered by god? Our average human spirit and mind will feel a bit of discomfort and repulsion. That exactly is what is happening with apostle John in Mark 9: 38-41. Membership in a religion in many phases in history, and religious practices like praying, church-going etc. has become tools and means of exercising superiority and control over others, or it becomes a means to exclude people. In the name of religion and religious practices we take control of what can be done, who can do it, what is good and bad, what is moral and what is immoral. This approach creates an exclusive moral, good, pure, and authentic race or people or group. We keep doing it as individuals and institutions for the fear of losing control over others. And that is the end of humanity. Stopping others from doing good comes from a sickening clo...

Great Teachers Create Vocal Students

 Picture a classroom where questions are met with impatience, where unique perspectives are dismissed, where vulnerable thoughts are cut short. Gradually, hands stop rising, eyes avoid contact, and the once-vibrant space becomes a vacuum of missed opportunities and untapped potential. This silence is not respect—it is retreat, it is a silent protest, and it is dissent. When teachers fail to listen, they unwittingly construct invisible barriers. Students quickly sense when their contributions hold no value, when their voices are merely tolerated rather than treasured. The natural response is self-preservation through silence. Why risk sharing when no one is truly receiving? This silent classroom is a warning sign. A teacher who does not listen will soon be surrounded by students who do not speak. Andy Stanley has spoken about it on leadership, "a leader who does not listen will gradually  be surrounded by people who do not speak." It is true in every field, including educatio...

Inter-religious Sensitivity in the Time of Covid-19

  I was religiously pleased and humanly excited to read the story of a Hindu doctor reciting Kalima Shahada for a dying Muslim Covid patient in Kerala. Beevathu, 56 year old, was all isolated from her family in a covid ward. She had been there for 17 days, she was on a ventilator, and it was increasingly clear that there was no hope. After the consent from her family she was taken off from the ventilator. Beevathu lies there between life and death. Nothing more to happen. But like any good dying Muslim, she perhaps wanted to hear the Kalima Shahada (the Islamic oath of faith) to be chanted to her by one of her family members; but there was none, the situation made it so. Dr. Rekha, a Hindu doctor, was attending to her all these days. She knew what was happening, and she also knew what was not happening. Dr. Rekha knew the words of Kalima Shahada , thanks to her upbringing in UAE. She went close to Beevathu’s bed chanted into her ears, “ La ilaha illallah Muhammadur rasulullah...

Jesus Sends Seventy-Two To Meet And Get Transformed

 For a person of faith, ‘God comes, ever comes’ is a constant experience; logically, it also means that God goes, ever goes to the other. We read in Romans, “God came to save us when we were still sinners.” At another point of time in history we were the other to whom God came.  Throughout his earthly journey, Jesus demonstrated a radical commitment to crossing boundaries, meeting others. This wasn't merely a strategy for spreading his message—it was a fundamental aspect of his vision for humanity. He didn't establish a comfortable base and wait for people to come to him. Instead, he was constantly moving—crossing territorial boundaries, cultural divides, and social barriers. He didn't try to change people from a distance through arguments or condemnation. He shared meals with tax collectors, conversed with Samaritan women, touched lepers, and welcomed children. Each encounter was an act of radical hospitality that said, you matter and your story matters. Jesus didn't k...