Skip to main content

The Heart of the Gospel is Mercy, Mercy, and Mercy

 In the Sermon on the Mount Jesus commands His disciples with a charge that has never stopped to unsettle: “Be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect” (Matthew 5: 48). The word lands like a stone thrown into still water. Circles of interpretation ripple outward. How? In what manner? By what conceivable standard?

Thirteen chapters later, the answer arrives—not as an abstraction, not as a philosophical treatise, but as a parable about a king, a debt, and a man who could not do what had been done for him (Matthew 18: 21–35). The perfection Jesus spoke of on the mountain now has a name, a shape, and a practice. It is mercy.

Christian perfection is not the perfection of the philosopher—the cold ideal untouched by human frailty. It is the perfection of the Father who “makes the sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust” (Matthew 5: 45). Divine perfection is not distance from the wounded. It is inexhaustible movement toward them. Mercy is not what God does reluctantly after justice is satisfied. Mercy is what God is. Mercy is the perfection of God.

There is a scene in the Gospel of John (chapter 8) so quietly subversive that interpreters have puzzled over it for centuries. A woman is dragged before Jesus, caught in adultery. The religious authorities—men trained in the court of condemnation—demand a verdict. The Law is clear, they insist. Moses commanded stoning. Jesus stoops and writes in the sand. What did He write? Some suggested He was writing the sins of her accusers. Others say He was transcribing the Law itself, turning the instrument of accusation back on those who wielded it. But spiritual theologians offer a reading that cuts deeper still: He was writing the same word, over and over: mercy, mercy, mercy.

Whether or not this is literally true, it is theologically true. It captures something essential about the grammar of Jesus’s life. He did not move through the world casting judgments like stones. He moved through it scattering pardons like seeds. The same word—forgive, mercy, pardon—appears in His parables, in His praxis, in the touch of His hands on lepers, the table He shared with tax collectors, the thief He welcomed from the cross. Jesus is not merely a teacher who speaks of mercy. He is mercy incarnate, walking the dusty roads of Galilee.

Peter thought he was being generous. “Lord, how often will my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?” (Matthew 18: 21). Seven was the number of perfection in Jewish tradition—the sacred number, the Sabbath number. Peter was offering a theology of mercy that was both sincere and, by any human standard, impressive. Jesus dismantles it entirely. Seventy-seven times. Or seventy times seven—the Greek permits both. It does not matter. The point is not arithmetic. Jesus is not asking His disciples to keep a ledger of offences and stop at the 49th. He is telling them that the ledger itself must be abolished. Mercy, in the Kingdom of God, is not a ceiling but a floor—the very ground on which we stand—and that is perfection.

Finally, on the cross Jesus perhaps kept repeating the word, mercy. He said: Father, forgive them. A Roman centurion—trained to recognise power in its most brutal forms, a man who had seen men die in every conceivable posture of agony, defiance, or despair—watched this and said: “Truly this was the Son of God” (Matthew 27:54). What did he see? Not a miracle. Not a resurrection. Not a theological argument. He saw a man, dying, forgiving. And he recognized in that forgiving something he could only call divine. Forgiveness has the face of God. When we forgive, we become, however briefly, however imperfectly, the faces of God.

This is the witness of the Old Testament too. In Genesis 33, Jacob returns to face his brother Esau—the brother he had cheated, deceived, and fled from in fear. He comes loaded with gifts, with prostrations, with the elaborate choreography of a man who expects punishment. But Esau—far from demanding justice—runs to him. Embraces him. Kisses him. Weeps with him. Jacob confesses, “To see your face is like seeing the face of God” (Genesis 33: 10). Jacob says it with awe he cannot contain: “To see your face is like seeing the face of God.” Not because Esau has become something superhuman. But because forgiveness, when it is freely and fully given, when it crosses every distance that resentment has created, makes the human face briefly transparent to something infinite. It lets the light of God shine through the wound.

mercy, God.

In 2016, Pope Francis published a small book that carries a large claim in its title: “The Name of God is Mercy.” It is a remarkable theological statement. Not “God is merciful”—an adjective, a quality, a characteristic among others. The name of God is mercy. Mercy is not what God has. It is what God is called, which is to say what God is.

For Christians, this has consequences that are at once liberating and demanding. If God’s name is mercy, then to be made in the image of God is to be made-up of mercy. And to refuse mercy—to hoard it, to ration it, to offer it conditionally and withdraw it at the first disappointment—is not merely a moral failing. It is a kind of theological amnesia. It is forgetting who God is. It is forgetting who we are.

An imperative is not a suggestion. It is not an aspiration. It is a command—the kind that comes not from a superior who can punish disobedience, but from a teacher who knows what we were made for and grieves when we fall short of it. Jesus does not command mercy because He enjoys commanding difficult things. He commands it because He has seen what happens to people who withhold it.

As far as possible—and the phrase matters, because mercy does not require us to pretend that wounds are not wounds—when you see the one indebted to you, whether in money, in hurt, in broken trust, in long-nursed grievance, and they are struggling: cancel the debt. Forgive. Let go. Not because it is easy. Not because they have earned it. But because you have been forgiven ten thousand talents, and you know what that felt like, and you cannot—you must not—be the person who received that grace and then seized another by the throat. It is not the perfection of the flawless. It is the perfection of the forgiving—the mercy that refuses to calculate, the grace that runs to embrace before the apology is finished, the love that keeps writing in the sand: forgive, mercy, pardon, again and again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Year, New Beginning

 The past year was different to different people. Some of us were very successful, won every battle we fought. Some others of us did not win every battle that we fought, might have found difficult even to get up from bed everyday, we just survived. But for both it is a new year. For those very successful, it is time to stand on the ground and not be overconfident, complacent, arrogant and egoistic. And it is also time to give back. And for those of us not very successful we have another new year with 365 blank pages, 365 blank days. It is a fresh new beginning. Start your dream and go all the way. “There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth—not going all the way, and not starting”, said Buddha. Every New Year tells that we cannot eternally postpone important things in our lives. We must begin somewhere. How many lives do we have on this earth? One, two, three, four, or more? One of the foremost thinkers and philosophers of China, Confucius, four centuries before ...

2025 Must Create Its Own Art

  People are afraid of art, because real art brings the question and the answer into your house.   Tonight’s art becomes inadequate
and useless when the sun rises in
the morning. The mistake lies not in creating art for tonight, but in assuming tonight’s answers will serve tomorrow’s questions. Louise Bourgeois, a French American artist, reflected, “art is a guaranty of sanity;” but that guarantee must be renewed with each dawn, each cultural shift, and
each evolution of human consciousness. If some art endures through generations, it
is only because of its capacity to speak, its ability to demand fresh interpretations that test and challenge the new. To guarantee sanity in the coming year, 2025 must create
its own art. Why create art? Why watch art? Why read literature? True art, in the words of Sunil P Ilayidam, shakes that which is rigid and unchangeable. Art serves as humanity’s persistent earthquake, destabilising comfortable certainties and creating space
for new ways of...

Fine Ways of Disregarding Vital Issues

 Observing the preoccupations of Pharisees, scribes and religious leaders of his time (Mark 7: 1-23) Jesus commended that they have fine ways of disregarding the commandments of God in order to maintain human traditions and interests. They put aside weightier matters to uphold human decrees. In modern politics we hear the jargon, ‘politics of distraction’. In a country of mass illiteracy and unemployment, farmers’ suicide, etc. politicians and other key people divert public attention by discussing building temples, girls wearing hijab to college, etc. Noam Chomsky, an American social commentator says, “The key element of social control is the strategy of distraction that is to divert public attention from important issues and changes decided by political and economic elites, through the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.” The corrupt politicians must have learned this strategy from the pickpockets (or is it visa versa): they di...

Human Empowerment Vs Technological Determinism

 This article, Seeking truth in a barrage of biases , presents an inspiring call to action for maintaining our intellectual autonomy in the digital age. Written by J Jehoson Jiresh, it addresses the critical challenge of navigating through algorithmic biases and misinformation while offering hope and practical solutions. The author beautifully frames our modern predicament - how even a simple online search for running shoes can shape our digital landscape - and transforms this everyday observation into a powerful message about reclaiming our agency in the digital world. What's particularly inspiring is the article's emphasis on human empowerment rather than technological determinism. The article presents three key strategies for hope and change: Active critical engagement to question assumptions and challenge biases Seeking diverse perspectives to break free from our echo chambers Demanding transparency and accountability in algorithmic systems Most uplifting is the article...

Zacchaeus’ Last Will

 Zacchaeus, as we know, was a chief tax collector and a rich man (Luke 19: 1-10). He, as any tax collectors of his time would do, used to collect much more than due, even by force and violence. Now we might say, in a very self-justifying manner, that I am not a tax collector, thus this gospel does not concern my life and me. The figures of a survey done on taxes; taxpayers and tax collectors could be quite embarrassing. 72% people do not pay taxes fully or partially. They cheat the country and the government. 26% of people pay the full tax, not because they love their country and its development but because of fear of being caught and punished; they are in a search of completely safe ways of evading taxes. The rest 2% are involved in collecting taxes. They cheat the country and people by collecting more and not correctly accounting for it. That leaves us with a 100% of ‘Zacchaeuses’ in our societies. Thus most of us stand in need of salvation for our families and ourselves. Zacchae...

Religion Must Help Greater Acceptance And Not Control

  What if you see people who never came to your church or never were part of the universal Church found with God; forgiven by god, loved by god, helped by god, and even pampered by god? Our average human spirit and mind will feel a bit of discomfort and repulsion. That exactly is what is happening with apostle John in Mark 9: 38-41. Membership in a religion in many phases in history, and religious practices like praying, church-going etc. has become tools and means of exercising superiority and control over others, or it becomes a means to exclude people. In the name of religion and religious practices we take control of what can be done, who can do it, what is good and bad, what is moral and what is immoral. This approach creates an exclusive moral, good, pure, and authentic race or people or group. We keep doing it as individuals and institutions for the fear of losing control over others. And that is the end of humanity. Stopping others from doing good comes from a sickening clo...

Great Teachers Create Vocal Students

 Picture a classroom where questions are met with impatience, where unique perspectives are dismissed, where vulnerable thoughts are cut short. Gradually, hands stop rising, eyes avoid contact, and the once-vibrant space becomes a vacuum of missed opportunities and untapped potential. This silence is not respect—it is retreat, it is a silent protest, and it is dissent. When teachers fail to listen, they unwittingly construct invisible barriers. Students quickly sense when their contributions hold no value, when their voices are merely tolerated rather than treasured. The natural response is self-preservation through silence. Why risk sharing when no one is truly receiving? This silent classroom is a warning sign. A teacher who does not listen will soon be surrounded by students who do not speak. Andy Stanley has spoken about it on leadership, "a leader who does not listen will gradually  be surrounded by people who do not speak." It is true in every field, including educatio...

Inter-religious Sensitivity in the Time of Covid-19

  I was religiously pleased and humanly excited to read the story of a Hindu doctor reciting Kalima Shahada for a dying Muslim Covid patient in Kerala. Beevathu, 56 year old, was all isolated from her family in a covid ward. She had been there for 17 days, she was on a ventilator, and it was increasingly clear that there was no hope. After the consent from her family she was taken off from the ventilator. Beevathu lies there between life and death. Nothing more to happen. But like any good dying Muslim, she perhaps wanted to hear the Kalima Shahada (the Islamic oath of faith) to be chanted to her by one of her family members; but there was none, the situation made it so. Dr. Rekha, a Hindu doctor, was attending to her all these days. She knew what was happening, and she also knew what was not happening. Dr. Rekha knew the words of Kalima Shahada , thanks to her upbringing in UAE. She went close to Beevathu’s bed chanted into her ears, “ La ilaha illallah Muhammadur rasulullah...

Jesus Sends Seventy-Two To Meet And Get Transformed

 For a person of faith, ‘God comes, ever comes’ is a constant experience; logically, it also means that God goes, ever goes to the other. We read in Romans, “God came to save us when we were still sinners.” At another point of time in history we were the other to whom God came.  Throughout his earthly journey, Jesus demonstrated a radical commitment to crossing boundaries, meeting others. This wasn't merely a strategy for spreading his message—it was a fundamental aspect of his vision for humanity. He didn't establish a comfortable base and wait for people to come to him. Instead, he was constantly moving—crossing territorial boundaries, cultural divides, and social barriers. He didn't try to change people from a distance through arguments or condemnation. He shared meals with tax collectors, conversed with Samaritan women, touched lepers, and welcomed children. Each encounter was an act of radical hospitality that said, you matter and your story matters. Jesus didn't k...