As I heard this Turkish fable, “When the axe came into forest, the trees said, the handle is one of us” what came to my mind was an figure and an event from the Gospels—Judas entering the garden to betray his master. The random violence of a stranger carries its own horror, but it is clean — it comes from outside, from the other, from the unknown. What undoes us far more completely is the wound delivered by a hand we once held.
When the axe came into the forest, the trees did not tremble at its iron head. Iron was always foreign, always cold, and always enemy. What silenced them—what stilled the whole canopy in something beyond fear—was the handle. Wood from their own family: grain and fibre they recognised. Perhaps from a tree that had fallen nearby, one they had sheltered with their roots, shared soil with, stood beside through decades of seasons. The forest could not rally against the axe, because the axe was partly themselves, the apostles could not rally against Judas, because he was partly themselves.
This is the anatomy of the deepest betrayal, it cannot be accomplished by an outsider; it requires initiation, intimacy, love, or at least its appearance. Judas Iscariot does it with a precision that is almost surgical. He did not point from a distance. He did not shout a name from across the garden of Gethsemane. He walked forward in the dark and kissed Jesus. The signal of recognition he chose was the most tender gesture in the human vocabulary, the greeting of devotion, and the mark of belonging.
And this is what makes both the proverb and the betrayal so enduring as symbols: they reveal that closeness is always a form of vulnerability. To let someone in, to the forest, to the inner circle, to the last supper, is to hand them the precise knowledge of how to undo you. The trees gave the axe-handle its shape. Jesus gave Judas his name, his trust, his company at the table. In both cases, the intimacy was real. That is the point. We understand it by sitting with the form it takes. The kiss. The wooden handle. The familiar thing become the instrument of destruction.
Perhaps the most unsettling truth these two images share is this: the forest still needs trees, and love still needs expression. The vulnerability cannot be engineered away. You cannot build a community of iron that needs no wood, and you cannot build a movement of love that takes no risks with human hearts. The axe will always find its handle somewhere. Someone will always know the garden where you go to pray, and know your face well enough to greet it. The great reversals of sacred history do not come from outside, from enemy armies, from foreign gods, from alien forces. They come from within the intimate circle, from the trusted hand, from the familiar face.
Comments
Post a Comment