Ego is the voice inside us that says ‘I’ — loudly, persistently, and almost always at the expense of ‘we.’ It goes by many names: pride, self-importance, confidence, self-esteem. Spiritual teachers across traditions have called it the false self, the small self, the self we must outgrow. Whatever the name, the behaviour is the same. Ego grasps. It reaches for power, money, position, recognition — not because these things are wrong in themselves, but because ego can never hold enough of them. It is a hunger with no bottom. It never arrives. It never says: this is enough.
Richard Rohr puts it starkly: for ego, everything is a commodity. Everything can be acquired, traded, leveraged. Even God. In Matthew 20: 20–28, a mother comes to Jesus with a request. She wants her two sons — James and John — to sit at his right and left hand when he comes into his Kingdom. It is a breathtaking ask. And what makes it more than a footnote is the way she asks it. She kneels. She adopts the posture of perfect devotion. She looks, to every eye in the room, like the model disciple.
This is what ego does when it gets sophisticated. It does not announce itself. It does not walk in wearing its ambition openly. It wraps itself in the language of faith, in the gestures of humility, in the costume of piety. She is not kneeling because she is surrendered. She is kneeling because she is negotiating. Devotion and piety, Rohr reminds us, have nothing automatically to do with spirituality. They can be, and often are, ego’s most elegant disguise.
We see this pattern everywhere religious institutions exist. A bishopric becomes a prize to be campaigned for. A priesthood becomes a career to be managed. A provincial title becomes a ladder rung to be reached. These are not positions being sought for the sake of the people who will be served. They are being bought — through influence, through loyalty, through the slow currency of favour — for the sake of the self that will be elevated. And when ego drives these choices, it does not merely corrupt the individual. It corrupts the system. It destroys what meritocracy and genuine calling are meant to build.
Jesus does not rebuke the mother gently. He is direct: it does not work that way. The hierarchy of the Kingdom, he says, is not his to assign. It has already been determined — by the Father — and it is determined by a single measure: the capacity to empty oneself in service of others. In the Kingdom, what matters is not who sits in the chair. It is who gets up from the chair to serve.
The cup Jesus speaks of is not a trophy. It is the willingness to suffer for others, to be poured out completely. It is not filling the cup, but emptying the cup. The question he turns back on James and John — ‘Can you drink the cup that I am going to drink?’ — is not a test of courage in the ordinary sense. It is a test of direction. Is your life pointed toward yourself, or toward others? Toward rising, or toward kneeling in truth rather than in theatre?
At the Last Supper, Jesus answers his own question. He gets up from the table. He takes off his outer robe. He wraps a towel around his waist and washes his disciples’ feet (John 13:4). The one who had every right to sit at the head of the table becomes, in that moment, the servant of everyone in the room. He does not perform this. He does not narrate it. He simply does it.
This is the reversal at the heart of the Gospel. Greatness is not what you accumulate. It is what you are willing to lay down. Honour is not what you buy with influence or occupy through ambition. It is what remains when everything buyable has been given away. The chair is not the point; the cup is.
Comments
Post a Comment