Skip to main content

Modern Humanity Is An Unfinished Revolution

 I want to begin with a startling proposition that challenges everything we assume about human nature: the modern human being—the person sitting in this room right now—is a recent invention. When Michel Foucault made this observation, he wasn't speaking metaphorically. The human being who believes in democracy, who recognises gender equality as a moral imperative, who feels genuine concern for the environment—this person would be virtually unrecognisable to most humans who have ever lived on this planet.

Supporting PDF: Man is a recent invention PDF

Cast your mind back to 1789. The French Revolution didn't just overthrow a government—it overthrew an entire understanding of what it means to be human. For millennia, human societies had been organised around the assumption that some people were born to rule and others to serve. Kings ruled by divine right. Nobility inherited power through blood. Clergy mediated between heaven and earth through institutional authority. Then, in a moment that still reverberates through history, ordinary people declared three revolutionary words: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. These weren't just political slogans—they were anthropological claims. They asserted that every human being possessed inherent dignity, that this dignity was equal across all people, and that we were bound together not by hierarchy but by kinship. France became a democracy. Then many other countries followed. But more than governments changed—humanity itself was being reinvented.

humanity,
The Democracy Within Us

Today, we don't just live in democracies—we think democratically. The modern human being has internalised democratic consciousness. We instinctively question authority. We expect our voices to be heard. We assume that power must be justified, not simply imposed. But this democratic thinking brings both promise and peril. We've witnessed how democracy can devolve into majoritarianism, how it can be manipulated by populism, how the voice of the people can become the tyranny of the majority.

The challenge of our time is to think democratically while thinking beyond simple democracy. We need what we might call "democratic wisdom"—the ability to hold together majority rule with constitutional protections, popular will with Gospel values, the voice of the many with the rights of the few. This means embracing inclusivity as a democratic virtue. It means protecting minority rights not despite democracy but because of it. It means practicing synodality—the ancient Christian art of walking together—as a democratic spiritual discipline.

Modern humanity has invented something unprecedented: the expectation that ordinary people should stand up, speak up, and ask questions. We take this for granted, but it represents a radical break with most of human history. For centuries, questioning authority was not just discouraged—it was literally unthinkable for most people. Today, we consider it a human right and a civic duty.

Gender and Dignity

Modern humanity, in principle, recognises gender equality, but this remains our most unfinished revolution. A short woman among tall people is doubly short; and embarrassed already too. This captures something profound about how oppression compounds itself. When we already live in systems that diminish certain people, any additional disadvantage becomes magnified. The woman who faces both gender bias and other forms of marginalisation experiences not just double difficulty but exponential vulnerability.

The language we use matters profoundly. Notice the difference between saying "20 women were abused" and naming "20 men have abused women." The passive voice obscures agency and responsibility. The active voice demands accountability.

Respecting women is not a progressive add-on to human dignity—it's a test of whether we've truly understood what modern humanity means. If we've invented the human being as someone with inherent worth and equal dignity, then gender equality isn't optional—it's definitional.

The Earth as Our Home

Perhaps the most recent aspect of modern humanity's invention is environmental consciousness. Care for the earth represents the latest expansion of our moral imagination. The story of climate change is not a new one, yet on moral grounds one can't stop saying it again, and again, and yet again, like daily prayers. This repetition isn't futile—it's formative. Just as daily prayer shapes the prayer, constantly returning to environmental concerns shapes us into the kind of humans who consider the earth worthy of care. But here's the challenge: Understanding it is not equal to realising it. We can know about climate change without truly grasping what it means. We can accept the science without allowing it to transform how we live.

Karl Marx's prophecy points toward humanity's next invention: "Individual private ownership of the earth (land) will appear just as much in bad taste as the ownership of one human being by another." Marx was suggesting that future humans will look back on private land ownership the way we look back on slavery—as a moral absurdity that once seemed natural and necessary. Whether or not you agree with Marx's economic analysis, his observation points to something crucial: modern humanity is still being invented. The moral intuitions that seem obvious to us today—democracy, equality, environmental concern—would have seemed radical or impossible to previous generations.

The most startling realisation is this: we are not finished products. Modern humanity is not a completed project but an ongoing invention. The democratic, egalitarian, environmentally conscious human being is still emerging. Every time someone stands up for justice, speaks truth to power, or extends care beyond their immediate tribe, they're participating in humanity's continuing invention. Every time someone chooses inclusion over exclusion, protection over exploitation, collaboration over domination, they're helping to create what the human being is becoming.

We are both the inventors and the invention. We are both the artists and the artwork. We are both the authors and the characters in the story of what humanity might become. The human being who can vote, who believes in gender equality, who feels genuine concern for the earth's wellbeing—this person is historically unprecedented. You are the inheritors of revolutions you didn't start and the architects of revolutions not yet finished.

From the Keynote given at FRISM 2025.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Year, New Beginning

 The past year was different to different people. Some of us were very successful, won every battle we fought. Some others of us did not win every battle that we fought, might have found difficult even to get up from bed everyday, we just survived. But for both it is a new year. For those very successful, it is time to stand on the ground and not be overconfident, complacent, arrogant and egoistic. And it is also time to give back. And for those of us not very successful we have another new year with 365 blank pages, 365 blank days. It is a fresh new beginning. Start your dream and go all the way. “There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth—not going all the way, and not starting”, said Buddha. Every New Year tells that we cannot eternally postpone important things in our lives. We must begin somewhere. How many lives do we have on this earth? One, two, three, four, or more? One of the foremost thinkers and philosophers of China, Confucius, four centuries before ...

2025 Must Create Its Own Art

  People are afraid of art, because real art brings the question and the answer into your house.   Tonight’s art becomes inadequate
and useless when the sun rises in
the morning. The mistake lies not in creating art for tonight, but in assuming tonight’s answers will serve tomorrow’s questions. Louise Bourgeois, a French American artist, reflected, “art is a guaranty of sanity;” but that guarantee must be renewed with each dawn, each cultural shift, and
each evolution of human consciousness. If some art endures through generations, it
is only because of its capacity to speak, its ability to demand fresh interpretations that test and challenge the new. To guarantee sanity in the coming year, 2025 must create
its own art. Why create art? Why watch art? Why read literature? True art, in the words of Sunil P Ilayidam, shakes that which is rigid and unchangeable. Art serves as humanity’s persistent earthquake, destabilising comfortable certainties and creating space
for new ways of...

Human Empowerment Vs Technological Determinism

 This article, Seeking truth in a barrage of biases , presents an inspiring call to action for maintaining our intellectual autonomy in the digital age. Written by J Jehoson Jiresh, it addresses the critical challenge of navigating through algorithmic biases and misinformation while offering hope and practical solutions. The author beautifully frames our modern predicament - how even a simple online search for running shoes can shape our digital landscape - and transforms this everyday observation into a powerful message about reclaiming our agency in the digital world. What's particularly inspiring is the article's emphasis on human empowerment rather than technological determinism. The article presents three key strategies for hope and change: Active critical engagement to question assumptions and challenge biases Seeking diverse perspectives to break free from our echo chambers Demanding transparency and accountability in algorithmic systems Most uplifting is the article...

Fine Ways of Disregarding Vital Issues

 Observing the preoccupations of Pharisees, scribes and religious leaders of his time (Mark 7: 1-23) Jesus commended that they have fine ways of disregarding the commandments of God in order to maintain human traditions and interests. They put aside weightier matters to uphold human decrees. In modern politics we hear the jargon, ‘politics of distraction’. In a country of mass illiteracy and unemployment, farmers’ suicide, etc. politicians and other key people divert public attention by discussing building temples, girls wearing hijab to college, etc. Noam Chomsky, an American social commentator says, “The key element of social control is the strategy of distraction that is to divert public attention from important issues and changes decided by political and economic elites, through the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.” The corrupt politicians must have learned this strategy from the pickpockets (or is it visa versa): they di...

Inter-religious Sensitivity in the Time of Covid-19

  I was religiously pleased and humanly excited to read the story of a Hindu doctor reciting Kalima Shahada for a dying Muslim Covid patient in Kerala. Beevathu, 56 year old, was all isolated from her family in a covid ward. She had been there for 17 days, she was on a ventilator, and it was increasingly clear that there was no hope. After the consent from her family she was taken off from the ventilator. Beevathu lies there between life and death. Nothing more to happen. But like any good dying Muslim, she perhaps wanted to hear the Kalima Shahada (the Islamic oath of faith) to be chanted to her by one of her family members; but there was none, the situation made it so. Dr. Rekha, a Hindu doctor, was attending to her all these days. She knew what was happening, and she also knew what was not happening. Dr. Rekha knew the words of Kalima Shahada , thanks to her upbringing in UAE. She went close to Beevathu’s bed chanted into her ears, “ La ilaha illallah Muhammadur rasulullah...

Religion Must Help Greater Acceptance And Not Control

  What if you see people who never came to your church or never were part of the universal Church found with God; forgiven by god, loved by god, helped by god, and even pampered by god? Our average human spirit and mind will feel a bit of discomfort and repulsion. That exactly is what is happening with apostle John in Mark 9: 38-41. Membership in a religion in many phases in history, and religious practices like praying, church-going etc. has become tools and means of exercising superiority and control over others, or it becomes a means to exclude people. In the name of religion and religious practices we take control of what can be done, who can do it, what is good and bad, what is moral and what is immoral. This approach creates an exclusive moral, good, pure, and authentic race or people or group. We keep doing it as individuals and institutions for the fear of losing control over others. And that is the end of humanity. Stopping others from doing good comes from a sickening clo...

Zacchaeus’ Last Will

 Zacchaeus, as we know, was a chief tax collector and a rich man (Luke 19: 1-10). He, as any tax collectors of his time would do, used to collect much more than due, even by force and violence. Now we might say, in a very self-justifying manner, that I am not a tax collector, thus this gospel does not concern my life and me. The figures of a survey done on taxes; taxpayers and tax collectors could be quite embarrassing. 72% people do not pay taxes fully or partially. They cheat the country and the government. 26% of people pay the full tax, not because they love their country and its development but because of fear of being caught and punished; they are in a search of completely safe ways of evading taxes. The rest 2% are involved in collecting taxes. They cheat the country and people by collecting more and not correctly accounting for it. That leaves us with a 100% of ‘Zacchaeuses’ in our societies. Thus most of us stand in need of salvation for our families and ourselves. Zacchae...

Great Teachers Create Vocal Students

 Picture a classroom where questions are met with impatience, where unique perspectives are dismissed, where vulnerable thoughts are cut short. Gradually, hands stop rising, eyes avoid contact, and the once-vibrant space becomes a vacuum of missed opportunities and untapped potential. This silence is not respect—it is retreat, it is a silent protest, and it is dissent. When teachers fail to listen, they unwittingly construct invisible barriers. Students quickly sense when their contributions hold no value, when their voices are merely tolerated rather than treasured. The natural response is self-preservation through silence. Why risk sharing when no one is truly receiving? This silent classroom is a warning sign. A teacher who does not listen will soon be surrounded by students who do not speak. Andy Stanley has spoken about it on leadership, "a leader who does not listen will gradually  be surrounded by people who do not speak." It is true in every field, including educatio...

The Resurrection Of Jesus Is A Testament

  Luke begins his gospel with a dialogue between the angel and Mother Mary in preparation for the incarnation. Mary did not understand much, much less did she humanly could believe. The angel told Mother Mary, ‘Nothing is impossible with God’ (Luke 1: 37). This gospel, as in other synoptic gospels, there are many incidents and events proving that there is nothing impossible with God: the lame walked, the dumb spoke, the hungry is fed, and so on. Mary in her own way must have strengthened others and the apostles with these words that she had received from the angel. But as we approach the end of the gospels the situation is so grim, Jesus, the master healer, the wonderworker is arrested, crucified, and buried, and a huge stone was rolled on to the face of the tomb. Humanly speaking everything is over. The disciples are scattered. The apostles are behind closed doors, in fear. The night had fallen.  There large stone rolled up to cover the tomb of Jesus is symboli...